Sunday, February 28, 2010

Rape Kits: Why Plan A Cares

I am a Georgetown student who has experienced Georgetown University Hospital’s response to rape situations. I made an urgent call to the Georgetown University Hospital seeking information about the availability of rape kits. I explained to the woman who answered the phone that my friend had been raped and I was calling on her behalf in search of the resources she needed. When I asked if my friend could get a rape kit at Georgetown University Hospital, I was confronted with a harsh reality that no rape survivor should have to face. I will describe Georgetown University Hospital policies through my personal experience with this call and I hope this demonstrates that the current state of affairs is not only inadequate but disgraceful for a university hospital and a grave threat to women’s health.

The first woman who answered the phone told me that I could not get a rape kit at the Georgetown Hospital. When I explained the urgency of my friend’s situation, she suggested that I try the George Washington Hospital. After I insisted on speaking with someone else who could give me more information, I was put on hold for well over five minutes. I was astounded that I was forced to wait for that length of time right after I had explained that my friend had been raped and was seeking emergency response. When another woman came on the line, she told me that my friend would have to go to the Washington Hospital Center in order to have access to a rape kit. She did not tell me what Georgetown Hospital could do for my friend until I explicitly asked her what resources Georgetown Hospital had for rape survivors. She explained that a survivor could be medically screened but that it would not include a rape kit. This is common procedure for most university hospitals in the District of Columbia, as the Washington Hospital Center serves as the only place where rape kits are administered. However, when I told the woman that my friend needed help getting to the Washington Hospital Center (map shown below), she casually suggested that we take a taxi.

View Larger Map


This suggestion revealed what Plan A finds most problematic about Georgetown University Hospital’s services for rape survivors. Plan A is pointing out not only that the university does not carry rape kits, but also that it provides no services for its students to access them elsewhere. It is unconscionable to expect rape survivors to get into a taxi and ride over to an unfamiliar hospital alone. Not only does this require the student to incur the expenses of transportation to an alternate location, but it also obliges a traumatized rape survivor to put themselves into an unsafe environment without any support from the university. I expressed these concerns to the woman from the hospital and asked if there were any other options. She explained that my friend could be transported to the Washington Hospital Center by MedStar (the company that owns Georgetown Hospital). This, once again, places tremendous financial burden on rape survivors and unquestionably will discourage many survivors from accessing essential resources like rape kits and comprehensive post-trauma care.

In order to lift these burdens from access to critical health services, the Georgetown administration must advocate on behalf of its students. It must provide free transportation to and from the Washington Hospital Center in order to facilitate safe and uninhibited access to rape kits. Anything less is an affront to the health and safety of rape survivors. Plan A also believes that the University should actively distribute information about steps to accessing services for sexual assault and rape survivors. It is the University’s responsibility to ensure that this information is made public, explicit and well-circulated.

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

University Response

Wednesday morning, Vice President of Student Affairs, Todd Olson, sent United Feminists and H*yas for Choice a letter in response to the letter we sent to President DeGioia. I'll post the entire letter below, but the general gist of it is that Georgetown has no intention of changing anything about the way that it approaches reproductive justice after reading what we wrote. While this response is not surprising, per se, it was disappointing to see the way that he completely avoided actually addressing any of the arguments we presented.

First of all, our response came not from President DeGioia, the person to whom we addressed the letter, but from Todd Olson. Additionally, the response contradicts itself a number of times, and parts of what he says are simply not true. For example, he writes, "I recognize that these are complex questions and that there are divergent points of view on the issues that you raise; that is why our policies and practices encourage debate and conversation." Unfortunately, the fact that Georgetown does not recognize a pro-choice perspective on campus actively discourages and prohibits debate and conversation. Keeping groups like H*yas for Choice from access to benefits and from having space anywhere except red square is an active move on the part of the university to keep its students in the dark on issues of reproductive justice and choice.

He goes on to write, "Nonetheless, as a Catholic and Jesuit university our policies must reflect our identity and our values." Again, as we laid out in our letter, denying students access to resources to allow them to lead healthy lives and censoring dialogue are not Jesuit values.

Part of his response also addressed rape kits specifically. He wrote "Because [Washington Hospital Center] is the only site in the city authorized to provide such assistance, Georgetown, like other universities in the District, refers patients to the Hospital Center for treatment. " He in no way responds to the question about how students who have been sexually assaulted get to the Hospital Center, which is crucial. The issue here is not only that survivors seem to have to deal with the logistical issues of navigating DC to get to a place that can offer support, but also that Georgetown does not make this information available and easily accessible to its students.

Finally, Dr. Olson says that “Georgetown University is committed to the free exchange of ideas. Through its Speech and Expression policy, the University provides students the opportunity to participate in dialogue on a wide range of issues." Then, however, he goes on to write, "As a Catholic and Jesuit institution, however, Georgetown cannot support organizations whose stated purpose conflicts with Catholic moral teaching. For that reason, H*yas for Choice, a group whose constitution espouses 'advocating for reproductive choice' is not eligible for access to university benefits.” If Georgetown University is committed to the free exchange of ideas, then all student groups should have the right to engage in open, uncensored dialogue and discussion around all issues, including reproductive justice and abortion. If the exchange of ideas is limited to ideas that are anti-choice, that exchange is not free. By funding GU Right to Life and hosting pro-life conferences on campus, the University is explicitly upholding certain ideas while silencing others. This does not show a commitment to a free exchange of ideas, but rather a commitment to silencing an entire community’s concerns about health and wellness on our campus.



The only thing this letter actually makes clear is the fact that the university is refusing to engage in a genuine way with our concerns.

To let Georgetown know that this response is unacceptable, sign our petition! Look for us tabling today in Leavey and next week either in Red Square or the Leavey lobby!


Letter from Todd Olson

February 24, 2010

Dear Student Leaders of United Feminists and H*yas for Choice,


President DeGioia has asked me to respond to your letter of February 5, 2010. In your letter, you raise questions about the University’s Speech and Expression policy and specifically about the Access to Benefits policy. Georgetown University is committed to the free exchange of ideas. Through its Speech and Expression policy, the University provides students the opportunity to participate in dialogue on a wide range of issues. As a Catholic and Jesuit institution, however, Georgetown cannot support organizations whose stated purpose conflicts with Catholic moral teaching. For that reason, H*yas for Choice, a group whose constitution espouses “advocating for reproductive choice” is not eligible for access to university benefits.

In response to your question about services for victims of sexual assault, District of Columbia residents have access to the services of a SANE (Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner) at the Washington Hospital Center. Because this is the only site in the city authorized to provide such assistance, Georgetown, like other universities in the District, refers patients to the Hospital Center for treatment. Finally, with regard to the availability of the HPV vaccine, students can obtain a prescription for the vaccine at Student Health Services and the prescription can be filled at the hospital’s out patient pharmacy, located across the street from the Student Health Center.

Georgetown’s policies and practices rest on the strong underpinning of Catholic social and moral teaching and its affirmation of the dignity of all persons from the beginning of life to its natural end. I recognize that these are complex questions and that there are divergent points of view on the issues that you raise; that is why our policies and practices encourage debate and conversation. Nonetheless, as a Catholic and Jesuit university our policies must reflect our identity and our values. I hope that this has been helpful to you and always welcome your questions.

Sincerely,


Todd A. Olson, Ph.D.
Vice President for Student Affairs
Georgetown University

Monday, February 22, 2010

Welcome to our campaign blog!

Plan A: Hoyas for Reproductive Justice is a coalition of students dedicated to changing the way that Georgetown University approaches issues of reproductive justice and choice. At this point, contraception is not available on campus or covered under Georgetown's insurance policy; rape kits are not available at the campus hospital; students do not have access to comprehensive sex education; and the administration silences the voices of pro-choice student groups. This is unacceptable. Georgetown prides itself on being a university dedicated to care of the whole person and the promotion of open dialogue, but its policies fail to truly promote these ideals; instead they actively endanger the health of its students, and especially women. Plan A: Hoyas for Reproductive Justice will be launching a campaign to encourage Georgetown to change its harmful, backwards policies and provide all students with access to the resources they need to lead healthy lives and engage in thoughtful discourse.

We will post regularly to this blog with updates on the campaign, so be sure to check back! For a more comprehensive outline of our demands, take a look at the Open Letter of Demands to President DeGioia, which we have linked at the top of the page.

Thanks for stopping by!